Deprecated Library Functions / Methods

[Walter Bright]

On 12/3/2012 6:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting the revamp
>> in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let std.xml wither
>> and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.
>
> Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because the
> correct name was already taken by something broken.

So call it xmlex like Microsoft does. The exact name isn't that precious.