Deprecated Library Functions / Methods

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/3/12 10:56 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>
>> I'm thinking it would be nice to just define a package xtd that
>> contains "new style" std libraries.
>
> Where do you put the libs if there's one more update? Calling it
> std.xml2, std.xml3, etc is easy to understand and to find, it's
> short and future proof, and there's no need to remember new names
> like "xmlex" (I sometimes don't remember what's the name of the
> updated regex lib. If they are named std.re1, std.re2, std.re3,
> etc there isn't that risk).
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Yup, there's a certain advantages to using numbers :o).

Andrei