Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

[Walter Bright]

On 12/10/2012 8:15 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 04:11:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I agree there was not a consensus reached on this issue. But I also feel all
>> the arguments were fairly represented, and it was time to make a decision.
>
> Note that either the decision is to reserve attribution to special types, and it
> is rather safe as it is what is done in other languages, or it is to allow
> everything to be an attribute, and it should be field tested before going into
> the main release, because unless I'm mistaken, no language do that ATM, so we
> can't rely on previous experience on the subject.

Yes I understand that, and it is being extensively and heavily used since the 
day I posted it, and no problems have arisen.

I also understand that you and I disagree on this issue, but at some point I've 
got to make a decision.