Next focus: PROCESS

[Jesse Phillips]

On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 16:14:44 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> I disagree. I wrote a few git scripts for Facebook-specific 
> workflows and a lot of people (including me) use them.

May have been a knee jerk reaction. Good to hear it has been used.

>> git-start-new-feature:
>> $ git checkout devbranch
>> $ git checkout -b newfeaturename
>>
>> git-start-bugfix:
>> $ git checkout stablebranch
>> $ git checkout -b fixbugxxx

> All of these will be part of the instructions and the macros. 
> The branch names will be standardized.

I'm not sure I follow on the name standardizing. Doesn't that 
make it so a person can only work on one bugfix and one feature 
at a time? The name used for the dev and stable branches should 
be standardized (I don't care much what master is, but I 
generally like it as the dev branch)

> All of these should be subsections in the documentation.
>
> "If your branch has conflicts"
>
> "If your branch became really messed up"

Yep, just pointing out where I see the difficulty and scripts may 
be of more use.

> What is the workbench project?
>
>
> Andrei

Found it, by Nathan Swan

http://forum.dlang.org/post/ygwzndxbwzrxzlhuooty@forum.dlang.org