Javascript bytecode

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/18/12 7:29 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:08:04PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 12/18/12 3:35 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> And no, I don't think D can be a systems language *and* eliminate all
>>> undefined and implementation defined behavior.
>>
>> The SafeD subset takes care of that.
> [...]
>
> Which right now suffers from some silly things like writefln not being
> able to be made @safe, just because some obscure formatting parameter is
> un at safe. Which is exactly how @safe was designed, of course.  Except
> that it makes SafeD ... a bit of a letdown, shall we say? - when it
> comes to practical real-world applications.
>
> (And just to be clear, I'm all for SafeD, but it does still have a ways
> to go.)

Yes, there are several bugs related to SafeD.

Andrei