std.simd module

[Manu]

On 5 February 2012 09:22, F i L <witte2008 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks good to me so far ;-)
>
>  First criticism I expect is for many to insist on a class-style vector
>> library, which I personally think has no place as a low level, portable
>> API.
>> Everyone has a different idea of what the perfect vector lib should look
>> like, and it tends to change significantly with respect to its
>> application.
>>
>
> I think it would be useful, especially to newcomers who are unfamiliar
> with D's lib terrain, to have an officially supported "utils" library for
> these higher-level structures.
>
> core // to the metal
> std // low-level but useful
> util // get the job done
>

Precisely my thoughts too. Something like 'util' may produce comprehensive,
very generic, standard constructs, but makes no guarantees that they are
efficient, or the best possible implementation for your application/context.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120205/bef8947f/attachment-0001.html>