turkeyman at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 02:18:38 PST 2012
On 5 February 2012 09:22, F i L <witte2008 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me so far ;-)
> First criticism I expect is for many to insist on a class-style vector
>> library, which I personally think has no place as a low level, portable
>> Everyone has a different idea of what the perfect vector lib should look
>> like, and it tends to change significantly with respect to its
> I think it would be useful, especially to newcomers who are unfamiliar
> with D's lib terrain, to have an officially supported "utils" library for
> these higher-level structures.
> core // to the metal
> std // low-level but useful
> util // get the job done
Precisely my thoughts too. Something like 'util' may produce comprehensive,
very generic, standard constructs, but makes no guarantees that they are
efficient, or the best possible implementation for your application/context.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Digitalmars-d