automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.

Iain Buclaw ibuclaw at
Mon Feb 6 03:24:53 PST 2012

On 27 January 2012 18:38, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
>> I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight forward it
>> is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add unneeded complexity which
>> should be avoided. I think the answer to a question such as "What's the
>> alternative to Qt in D?" should not be "Qt bindings" but maybe a library
>> which imitates the implementation and/or interface of Qt UI widgets in
>> native D.
> some scary numbers

To be taken with a pinch of salt.  I raised an eyebrow or two when
looking at the estimated cost for GDC. ;-)

Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list