Paulo Pinto pjmlp at progtools.org
Sun Feb 12 09:38:10 PST 2012

Am 12.02.2012 15:27, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
> "Daniel Murphy"<yebblies at nospamgmail.com>  wrote in message
> news:jh85rp$2rs4$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> "Paulo Pinto"<pjmlp at progtools.org>  wrote in message
>> news:jh7v08$2chs$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> If you remove all of that then how good would D- be in regard with
>>> existing languages being used for the same tasks?
>> You still have all of D's compile-time magic, which I miss every time I
>> need to do embedded programming.  You still have the simple syntax
>> improvement. I would love to be able to do away with the preprocessor and
>> stupidly_long_method_names_because_of_no_overloading_or_method_syntax.
> Plus a module system that's actually sane.

+1 on this one actually.

C, C++ and Objective-C are the only languages without proper module 
support. I really miss my Turbo Pascal days, where compilation was
just instantanious.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list