Programming for std.log

David Nadlinger see at
Sun Feb 12 14:32:19 PST 2012

On 2/12/12 11:22 PM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> Sorry for the false alarm. I think the problem went away once I
> rebuild dmd, druntime and phobos. Your advice was really good in
> helping me make any sense of this! Thanks.
> -Jose

So std.log is still/again ready for review?

std.log has been in the queue forever (but was previously postponed due 
to Jose being unavailable), std.uuid is small (but parts of it depend on 
not-yet-in-Phobos hashing code), and Jacob Carlborg is waiting for 
feedback on Orange – no clear winner, but to finally get the process 
running again, I'd suggest to begin the std.log review tomorrow. Since 
nobody else stepped up, I'd volunteer as review manager.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list