Programming for std.log
see at klickverbot.at
Sun Feb 12 14:32:19 PST 2012
On 2/12/12 11:22 PM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> Sorry for the false alarm. I think the problem went away once I
> rebuild dmd, druntime and phobos. Your advice was really good in
> helping me make any sense of this! Thanks.
So std.log is still/again ready for review?
std.log has been in the queue forever (but was previously postponed due
to Jose being unavailable), std.uuid is small (but parts of it depend on
not-yet-in-Phobos hashing code), and Jacob Carlborg is waiting for
feedback on Orange – no clear winner, but to finally get the process
running again, I'd suggest to begin the std.log review tomorrow. Since
nobody else stepped up, I'd volunteer as review manager.
More information about the Digitalmars-d