Impressed

[bearophile]

Philippe Sigaud:

> Do you happen to still have the code, by any chance? I think 
> Phobos
> could use a std.fsm

The code is not general enough for Phobos.


Kagamin:

> I heard, gcc optimizer can tear functions into common pieces 
> and them reassemble the functions back from these pieces, or 
> simply inline them, won't you get the same result?

Sometimes those FSM are the only part of those small C or D 
programs where I don't trust the optimizers. But thankfully in 
C-GCC using a little of __builtin_expect() it's not necessary to 
generate the assembly directly from the FSM description.

Bye,
beaophile