Breaking backwards compatiblity

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Alex Rønne Petersen" <xtzgzorex at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jjg7dq$24q$1 at digitalmars.com...
> On 10-03-2012 18:58, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>
>> Then you must be running a very different Linux from the one I use. In
>> my experience, it's Windows that's an order of magnitude less responsive
>> due to constant HD thrashing (esp. on bootup, and then periodically
>> thereafter) and too much eye-candy.
>
> This. On the other hand, OS X has all the eye candy and is still extremely 
> responsive. ;)
>

That's because they cram [their] hardware upgrades down your throat every 
couple years.