scope(exit) without exception handling?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-05-16 15:10, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> I don't see exception handling in the generated code (at least I don't
> see the _d_local_unwind2), I wonder a) if this is more efficient than
> scope(exit), and b) if so, why can't the compiler do this automatically?

I'm guessing because constructors and destructors hadn't been introduced 
for structs when the scope-statement was.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg