Request for Review: DI Generation Improvements

[dawg]

On Tuesday, 15 May 2012 at 06:46:58 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:11:50 -0700, Jonathan M Davis 
> <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, May 14, 2012 23:03:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
>>> I have updated the make files so that only core.thread and 
>>> core.sync.* are
>>> run through DI generation. ALL other core.* modules are 
>>> copied into the
>>> import directory now.
>>
>> I assume that object.di and core/thread.di are being used 
>> rather than their
>> corresponding .d files being run through the .di generation? 
>> They already have
>> hand-crafted .di files.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> The funny thing is that core.thread.di was being run through 
> the DI generator in the old make file. I had left it that way, 
> I have posted a commit that moves it to the copy section.

I did that so that the same di generation logic is applied to
the handwritten import files. Currently I don't really expect any
difference though.