D vs C++11

[Paulo Pinto]

On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 21:53:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/2/2012 2:33 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> I said the gap is getting thinner, not that is gone. It got 
>> foreach, some form
>> of CTFE, static assert, lambda to mention a few new features.
>
>
> No ranges. No purity. No immutability. No modules. No dynamic 
> closures. No mixins. Little CTFE. No slicing. No delegates. No 
> shared. No template symbolic arguments. No template string 
> arguments. No alias this.

Agree with everything, but D is a hard sell in the enterprise 
given C++'s maturity.