D vs C++11

[Timon Gehr]

On 11/02/2012 11:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:53:05 -0700
> Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/2/2012 2:33 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>> I said the gap is getting thinner, not that is gone. It got
>>> foreach, some form of CTFE, static assert, lambda to mention a few
>>> new features.
>>
>>
>> No ranges. No purity. No immutability. No modules. No dynamic
>> closures. No mixins. Little CTFE. No slicing. No delegates. No
>> shared. No template symbolic arguments. No template string arguments.
>> No alias this.
>
> No proper modules. No properties. Slow compilation.  No reference
> semantics for classes. No scope guards. Little default initialization.
> Goofy ptr and func-ptr declaration syntax. Goofy rules about what
> is/isn't virtual. Lots of undefined behavior. Forward declarations.
>
> Things I'm not entirely certain about:
>
> No IFTI?

IFTI is there.

> No polysemous literals?

If I understand the term right, then 0 is polysemous.

> No finally?
>

Good catch.

Also: No scope guards. No exception root type. No exception chaining, ...