Is there interest in a std.http?

[Pragma Tix]

On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 12:12:27 UTC, Nicolas Sicard 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 03:49:57 UTC, Tyler Jameson 
> Little wrote:
>> Would a minor refactor of vibe.d be acceptable? This is pretty 
>> much what I'm looking for:
>>
>> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/source/vibe/http/common.d
>> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/source/vibe/http/server.d
>>
>> Except that I'd remove some parts of it, like JSON parsing.
>>
>> I think that vibe.d could benefit from moving some of the code 
>> there into Phobos. I guess it comes down to whether it makes 
>> sense to make a standard HTTP library.
>
> BTW, the actual JSON module in viba.data.json in richer in 
> functionality and easier to use than the one in std.json. The 
> module has virtually no dependency on other parts of vibe.d. I 
> whish it was also moved to Phobos or at least inspired a 
> refactoring of std.json.
>
> Nicolas

vibe.d is MIT licensed. (Like almost every other WEB related 
library) Guess you have to ask Soenke for a permission.