Errors compiling DSSS

[Gor Gyolchanyan]

Just like DDOC adds auxiliary information to create documentation, build
comments would add auxiliary information to create build scripts (which a
tool could just use right away without generating garbage in the form of
build script files).


On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan <
gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com> wrote:

> The convenience of RDMD comes from the fact, that it looks into the source
> files to determine what to do. I think it would be even more convenient to
> make a build tool for D, which would read special comments (much like DDOC,
> but dedicated to build process) for compiler flags and other build
> variables.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-11-27 08:13, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>
>>> I'd recommend RDMD. It can compile (and run) the given module and it's
>>> entire import tree. No build scripts are necessary.
>>> Very convenient with pragma(lib, "...")
>>>
>>
>> RDMD is quite good for compiling executables. It won't work for compiling
>> libraries. Quite often a build script is needed to avoid repeating the same
>> compiler/linker flags over and over again.
>>
>> --
>> /Jacob Carlborg
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bye,
> Gor Gyolchanyan.
>



-- 
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121127/f096bc58/attachment.html>