Help!

1100110 0b1100110 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 28 09:19:40 PST 2012


On 11/28/2012 07:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 13:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> Yep. Rails 4 breaks Rails 3 code. Not Rails 3.061 breaks Rails 3.060
>> code :o).
>
> I've talked about that before. D doesn't have a versioning scheme that
> makes any sense. It's just a number that gets incremented without any
> meaning. Except that a greater number indicates a later version. Also
> changes to the language, compiler, runtime and standard library always
> happen in the same release.
>

I must admit that I'm surprised that no one has simply forked the 
project in order to apply their own versioning scheme to it.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list