make install; where do .di files go?

[Manu]

On 17 October 2012 00:00, H. S. Teoh <hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:48:54 +0200 Jordi Sayol <g.sayol at yahoo.es>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Al 16/10/12 17:17, En/na Manu ha escrit:
> [...]
> > > > Can DMD just be fixed to include [local/]/include/d in it's
> > > > default search paths? I presume GDC and LDC already look there?
> > >
> > > Linux dmd will not include /usr/include/d path by default to avoid
> > > conflicts with ldc1 (tango) "object.di" incompatibility, and I
> > > recommend you to not use this path for that reason.
> > >
> >
> > Then we can use '/usr/include/d2'. Problem solved ;)
>
> I propose /usr/include/d/${version}/. It will make it possible for
> multiple versions of dmd to coexist, as well as eliminate version
> incompatibility problems (or at least make them very unlikely).
>
> Mixing everything in /usr/include/d (or /usr/include/d2) with the fact
> that dmd releases have been incompatible with older druntime/phobos is
> just asking for trouble.
>

I don't really care about the compilers own drunntime/phobos.
I want to know where to install 3rd party libs.
They should be identical no matter what compiler is compiling them. C has
/usr/[local/]include/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121017/6fc6366b/attachment.html>