[just talk] what if implicitly typed literals were disallowed

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 16:38:12 PDT 2012


On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 at 23:16:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> It also helps against this kind of bugs that are *not* 
> acceptable in a language that defines itself as "safer than C":

Yes, I agree this should be caught with literals at compile time. 
It's just kinda silly not to. (if you explicitly want overflow, 
you can always cast it or something)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list