Extending unittests [proposal] [Proof Of Concept]

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-09-20 19:37, Johannes Pfau wrote:

> That's just an example output. We could leave the druntime
> test runner as is and don't change the output at all. We could only
> print the failure messages. Or we could collect all failures and print
> them at the end. All that can easily be changed in druntime (and
> I'd argue we should enhance the druntime interface, so everyone could
> implement a custom test runner), but we need the compiler changes to
> allow this.

It's already possible, just set a unit test runner using 
Runtime.moduleUnitTester.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg