UFCS for struct opCall?

[Timon Gehr]

On 04/09/2013 02:40 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 12:21 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> I don't think this makes any sense. Constructor are not regular
>> function. The bug lies in the fact that this work and not in the opCall
>> not working IMO.
>> ...
>
> On 04/09/2013 11:03 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:

That's "AM".

>> Furthermore, the only argument brought up against this so far is that
>> some
>> language constructs are special and ergo they must be mutually
>> incompatible.
>> This is a complete non sequitur.
>
> I still do not get what this is about.