Formal Review of std.process
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Thu Apr 11 11:20:02 PDT 2013
On 2013-04-11 17:43, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> A couple minor comments:
>
> 1. I have two issues with Error being used. One is that we should have
> a specific type that is thrown, not raw Error type. Second is that I
> think in situations where the error is due to an incorrect parameter, it
> should be an exception not an error (and not a straight Exception either!).
Does it throw an Error, that's bad. Code should basically never create
and throw an Error or Exception. It should always be a derived type from
either of these classes.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list