Evangelizing Your Cool Product

[Borislav Kosharov]

On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 14:12:32 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 02:27:42 UTC, Walter Bright 
> wrote:
>> On 8/6/2013 4:28 PM, MattCoder wrote:
>> It simply isn't enough to create a great product.
>
> I did try. At my job. Basically, answers that I received were 
> like: "it's unfinished." (they meant language is changing and 
> tools are immature)
>
> I do not know if it is helpful of not, or if it is true or not.
>
> But these were the answers that I received.
>
> What I perceived: language should state on those several 
> ambiguous issues (@property was quoted, complex numbers) and 
> tools should get some maturity (the .so thing for one).

Yea, I don't like how you have to write properties in D. I 
usually write them like this:
@property {
     int myNum() {
         return _myNum;
     }
     void myNum(int value) {
         _myNum = value;
     }
}

I saw that in the D conf it was stated that @property will be 
changed? I was wondering if there is any progress on that and how 
will the new properties look like? Are they going to be replaced 
by templates or something else? Has anyone written his own 
property generators?