A suggestion on keyword for_each

[monarch_dodra]

On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 01:33:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> `foreach_reverse` is a major design mistake considering the 
> fact that it requires a very specific range type, contrary to 
> normal range. For lot of ranges concept of iteration order is 
> simply not defined making `foreach_reverse` useless. And in 
> rare cases when it is needed, it can be replaced with plain 
> `for`.
>
> Hardly does any harm, but definitely not worth putting any 
> efforts into it.

foreach (foreach_reverse) work like a charm for iterating over 
dchars in a narrow string though.