std.logger

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 8/23/13 1:10 PM, Robert Schadek wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 09:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> (Just hanging this to a random comment in this thread.) I think
>> there's some pretty good work on logging by myself and another poster
>> (Jose?) that has since gone abandoned. It included some nice approach
>> to conditional logging and had both compile-time and run-time
>> configurability
>
> Yes I know, but as you said, it got abandoned. So something must have
> been wrong.
> I rather start something fresh and argue about whats wrong with that,
> than argue
> whats wrong with something old that has been already argued about and
> got abandoned.
>

Great. There was nothing wrong with it except it got no more work. I'd 
expect a new framework to be at least as good if not better.

Andrei