std.logger

[Robert Schadek]

On 08/23/2013 11:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 8/23/13 1:10 PM, Robert Schadek wrote:
>> On 08/23/2013 09:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> (Just hanging this to a random comment in this thread.) I think
>>> there's some pretty good work on logging by myself and another poster
>>> (Jose?) that has since gone abandoned. It included some nice approach
>>> to conditional logging and had both compile-time and run-time
>>> configurability
>>
>> Yes I know, but as you said, it got abandoned. So something must have
>> been wrong.
>> I rather start something fresh and argue about whats wrong with that,
>> than argue
>> whats wrong with something old that has been already argued about and
>> got abandoned.
>>
>
> Great. There was nothing wrong with it except it got no more work. I'd
> expect a new framework to be at least as good if not better.
>
> Andrei
>
Of course, it has to be phobos worthy.