Go compiler moving from C to Go

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 23/12/13 12:57, Francesco Cattoglio wrote:
> No real battleplan other than turning it into a DUB package, then I guess I will
> move from there. But first, I need to analyze and understand the 2 codebases:
> the Kyllingstad one and the cristicbz fork. I'd like to understand if there's
> any way to reconciliate them and/or which one is the "best" to start working on.

Sounds good to me.  By the way, I think Cristi was considering targeting the 
linear algebra work towards Phobos -- you might like to consider if some parts 
of SciD could be reworked as standard library features, although obviously you 
have greater freedom to extend and experiment in an independent library.

> After that I'll probably look into linear algebra. But this will start next
> year. I need to properly learn D with this project (I only played with it untill
> now, no serious projects on the record).

You are going to have a lot of fun.  Getting one's teeth seriously into D is a 
very pleasurable experience.

(Ways to know the internet has jaded you no. 43995123: understanding how 4chan 
users will read the previous sentence....:-)

> Help is welcome, ofc. Kyllingstad himself wanted SciD to be a community effort.

I'm interested, but it's always about time commitments.  But if you can come up 
with a TODO list, I'll promise to take a look :-)