Request for comments: std.d.lexer

Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.olsh at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 07:35:54 PST 2013


08-Feb-2013 19:34, Brian Schott пишет:
> On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:23:00 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
>> On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:12:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>> DMD is still consistently faster, :(
>>
>> We might be getting to the part where we say that code generated by
>> gcc is still consistently faster than code generated by ldc.
>
> For the lulz I compiled with "dmd -release -inline -noboundscheck -O
> -m64 -property":
>
> http://hackerpilot.github.com/experimental/std_lexer/images/times3-dmd.png
>
> Yes, dmd vs ldc actually is a matter of 32 vs 18 ms for datetime.

Would be intereesting to try gdc as dmd on linux uses gcc.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list