Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-09 21:51, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

> I think that's asking for confusion to have different visibility rules
> inside and outside typeof().
>
> The typical way to access private members when really needed is via a
> reflection mechanism, and we already have a way to do that as two
> people have mentioned.

Couldn't typeof() be considered part of a reflection mechanism?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg