What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[John Colvin]

On Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 21:40:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2013-02-14 22:21, John Colvin wrote:
>
>> I personally don't see why orange can't just be included as 
>> part of
>> orbit. It's written and maintained by the same person after 
>> all.
>
> Sure it can. Would that be ok?

I would see it as a good test of the library, helping to iron out 
issues before perhaps being included in phobos in future. Seems 
like everyone wins.