What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-15 19:48, Jesse Phillips wrote:

> To add to this. BSD requires the license be distributed with Binary
> forms, Boost explicitly does not. That is their real difference.
>
> This is something Walter wants to avoid with the standard library (I
> agree) but for utility programs it is unimportant since they can be used
> to build the binary and since they are not distributed with the created
> binary there is no need to distribute the BSD license.

Exactly. This won't affect anything built with the DMD compiler and Phobos.

> So the discussion for the library Orbit uses should remain related on
> how much trouble there will be from having an official program use a
> library not part of d-programming-language/tools and friends.

Yes. We can also discussion why that library cannot be part of 
d-programming-language/tools and friends.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg