When will we have std.log?

Colin Grogan grogan.colin at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 02:45:30 PST 2013


On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García 
Sancio wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main at 163.com> wrote:
>
>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>
>
> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some 
> basic API
> issues that were outlined during the review process but not 
> enough to put
> it through another review process.
>
> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos 
> repository but I has
> since create a separate repository so that it could be used 
> even if it is
> not part of std/phobos.
>
> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two 
> different APIs
> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose 
> logging:
> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would 
> merge the two.
> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is 
> inspired by
> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to 
> completely flush out
> the new API and run it by the community.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jose

Hi Jose,

How are you getting on with the std.log module?
Would be great to have one to use.

Colin



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list