When will we have std.log?
Colin Grogan
grogan.colin at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 02:45:30 PST 2013
On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García
Sancio wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main at 163.com> wrote:
>
>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>
>
> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some
> basic API
> issues that were outlined during the review process but not
> enough to put
> it through another review process.
>
> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos
> repository but I has
> since create a separate repository so that it could be used
> even if it is
> not part of std/phobos.
>
> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two
> different APIs
> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose
> logging:
> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would
> merge the two.
> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is
> inspired by
> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to
> completely flush out
> the new API and run it by the community.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jose
Hi Jose,
How are you getting on with the std.log module?
Would be great to have one to use.
Colin
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list