When will we have std.log?

Alexandr Druzhinin drug2004 at bk.ru
Wed Feb 20 04:40:24 PST 2013


20.02.2013 17:45, Colin Grogan пишет:
> On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García Sancio
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main at 163.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>>
>>
>> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some basic API
>> issues that were outlined during the review process but not enough to put
>> it through another review process.
>>
>> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos repository but I
>> has
>> since create a separate repository so that it could be used even if it is
>> not part of std/phobos.
>>
>> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two different
>> APIs
>> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose logging:
>> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would merge the
>> two.
>> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is inspired by
>> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to completely
>> flush out
>> the new API and run it by the community.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Jose
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> How are you getting on with the std.log module?
> Would be great to have one to use.
>
> Colin
>
Yes, it would be great really


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list