DIP27 available for destruction

[Dmitry Olshansky]

26-Feb-2013 20:16, deadalnix пишет:
> Carmack said : « I will always take an aggressively simple approach to
> things » and so I did, as I love cargo cult.
>
> More seriously, I face the need of more simplicity into D quite often,
> as the feature matrix is quite heavy.
>
> So here is a new DIP about function call (and function call only, I have
> 2 more DIP to come, but writing them take quite a lot of time). I
> actually had the time to play around with different scheme, and that one
> seems clearly to be the simplest.
>
> As usual, destroy, I don't expect to get unanimity on that. But I tried
> very hard to get most benefit of actual situation, including the
> possibility of optional parentheses in some situations (even if I'm not
> the biggest fan of it, I recognize that they are nice).

I like the simplicity and the automatic anti-boilerplate "@property int 
blah;".

The fact that empty can't be "enum empty = false;" is a problem since 
that's how infinite ranges are statically distinguished.


-- 
Dmitry Olshansky