DIP27 available for destruction

[Dmitry Olshansky]

26-Feb-2013 22:03, Dmitry Olshansky пишет:
> 26-Feb-2013 20:16, deadalnix пишет:
>> Carmack said : « I will always take an aggressively simple approach to
>> things » and so I did, as I love cargo cult.
>>
>> More seriously, I face the need of more simplicity into D quite often,
>> as the feature matrix is quite heavy.
>>
>> So here is a new DIP about function call (and function call only, I have
>> 2 more DIP to come, but writing them take quite a lot of time). I
>> actually had the time to play around with different scheme, and that one
>> seems clearly to be the simplest.
>>
>> As usual, destroy, I don't expect to get unanimity on that. But I tried
>> very hard to get most benefit of actual situation, including the
>> possibility of optional parentheses in some situations (even if I'm not
>> the biggest fan of it, I recognize that they are nice).
>
> I like the simplicity and the automatic anti-boilerplate "@property int
> blah;".
>
> The fact that empty can't be "enum empty = false;" is a problem since
> that's how infinite ranges are statically distinguished.

Ouch and I've reviewed an updated version of DIP 26 :)

Mh-m OK the warm-up is done, and it was nice to see a refined DIP26. 
Time to get to the new stuff...

I take it DIP27 was modeled after Scala? I think I like it but it leaves 
me wondering what properties are now and how they would fit. Eagerly 
waiting for more DIPs.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky