@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Iain Buclaw]

On 24 January 2013 13:40, d coder <dlang.coder at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> As much as I want to agree, I also feel this comes as too little, too late
>> to come to this conclusion now.
>>
>
> +1
>
> And therefor we should take out @property ASAP :-)
>
>
Not going to happen.  Effectively what is being proposed here is that we
are going to be stuck with the current state of @property for the next 7
years, and no bugs will be fixed on it as its on deprecation.

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130124/c282615a/attachment.html>