D for scientific computing

[Walter Bright]

On 1/24/2013 8:36 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Nevertheless, I also have made the same observation that code produced
> by gdc consistently outperforms code produced by dmd. Usually by about
> 20-30%, sometimes as much as 50-60%, IME. That's a pretty big
> discrepancy for me, esp. when I'm doing compute-intensive geometric
> computations.

Do you mean floating point code? 32 or 64 bit?