@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Timon Gehr]

On 01/28/2013 12:34 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01/27/2013 06:33 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>> ...
>> "unambiguous" == "I can understand semantics of code I have just read
>> with as little additional context as possible"
>> ...
>
> In order to do that, it is necessary

to be

> aware of the precise definitions,
> or at least specifications, of referenced declarations in any case. So
> by your definition, the current function call syntax is "unambiguous".