Possible @property compromise

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:54:21 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer  
<schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:


> Also note that structs are not meant to have internal pointers.  So a  
> "property" struct with an internal pointer

Forgot to finish this sentence before I hit send.

So a "property" struct with an internal pointer would have to be modified  
when a copy of the struct is made.  But this is bad, structs are supposed  
to be movable WITHOUT updating anything.

-Steve