Possible @property compromise

[Era Scarecrow]

On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 23:05:14 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:54:21 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer 
> <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Also note that structs are not meant to have internal 
>> pointers.  So a "property" struct with an internal pointer
>
> Forgot to finish this sentence before I hit send.
>
> So a "property" struct with an internal pointer would have to 
> be modified when a copy of the struct is made.  But this is 
> bad, structs are supposed to be movable WITHOUT updating 
> anything.

  Except when postblit is defined...? Or opAssign?