std.compress
Jakob Ovrum
jakobovrum at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 19:09:07 PDT 2013
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 22:34:55 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> There is a reason we don't call every function in phobos
> 'process' and let
> the module name tell us what is actually does - when you see
> the name in
> your source code, it is easy to recognize what is being done.
"copy", "write" and "compress" are perfectly recognizable names.
> tl;dr We have great tools to disambiguate when we have to.
> Let's not have
> to.
The way I see it, you're asking that all code should pay for the
benefit of a minority of cases. I'd choose the inverse.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list