std.compress

Jakob Ovrum jakobovrum at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 19:09:07 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 22:34:55 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> There is a reason we don't call every function in phobos 
> 'process' and let
> the module name tell us what is actually does - when you see 
> the name in
> your source code, it is easy to recognize what is being done.

"copy", "write" and "compress" are perfectly recognizable names.

> tl;dr We have great tools to disambiguate when we have to.  
> Let's not have
> to.

The way I see it, you're asking that all code should pay for the 
benefit of a minority of cases. I'd choose the inverse.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list