reddit discussion on replacing Python in 0install

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Jun 14 13:31:35 PDT 2013


On 6/14/2013 1:02 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I think in the end, we are optimizing here in the wrong place.  If a specific
> hardware/software combination requires specific buffering, the place to handle
> it is in the runtime, not code on top of it.  If the C runtime that D uses isn't
> up to snuff, let's use a different scheme, or abandon it all together *for that
> specific device*.

There's simply no reason to do that. There has been a fix proposed that not only 
solves the problem correctly (your solution is incomplete), it does not require 
any improvements to the underlying C runtime.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list