Any takers for http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673?

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 15:30:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 15:11:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 15:04:42 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
>>> Caveat: A directed graph with no cycles is over-simplistic.
>>> Someone with a large project could perhaps tell what the
>>> average % of rebuilt modules would be.
>>
>> It is 100% as long as this bug exists : 
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9571
>
> Doesn't this bug make incremental compilation (in projects 
> where it is encountered) impossible, rather than simply 
> impractical?

It really depend on the coding style. If you do some C-like D, 
everything is fine, but if you use complex feature of D, then 
incremental compilation become clearly impossible (I spent a fair 
amount of time on the problem).