C++ guys hate static_if?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 3/14/13 1:43 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:38:52 -0400
> Andrei Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>  wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/13 11:05 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
>>> Having to instantiate a template just to check to make sure it is
>>> semantically correct is a huge pain.
>>
>> I'm not sure about that. The way I see it, no code should be not
>> delivered without being unittested. Ubiquitous unittesting is now
>> mainstream. The way I see it, a type system on top of templates would
>> only help people who don't write unittests.
>>
>
> What the hell is this, a JS/Python forum all of a sudden? You're
> literally making the exact same argument as "We don't need no steenkin'
> static type checking."

No.

Andrei