My thoughts & tries with rvalue references

[Minas Mina]

On Saturday, 30 March 2013 at 09:17:17 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> And to pull the reverse: Why should '@val ref' be more 
> intuitive than ref&? Or why should be '@ref' more intuitive?
> What I mean by that:
> Both the Property as well as the hybrid path have their 
> weaknesses and are not necessarily immediately obvious. But we 
> should choose one of them and focus on this so that somebody 
> can make a pull request for it.

Because & in C++ means "by ref".
D has "ref" for that.

So ref& doesn't make sense. One might think it as a double 
reference(?)