std.uni vs std.unicode and beyond?

[Dmitry Olshansky]

21-May-2013 22:12, Brad Anderson пишет:
> On Tuesday, 21 May 2013 at 17:53:02 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
>
>> The problem is that people that need Unicode stuff see `std.utf` and
>> assume that all Unicode related stuff are there.
>
> I see (and experience myself) a lot of confusion over this. Dealing with
> strings a person constantly has to guess which of these modules has what
> they are looking for:
>
> std.algorithm
> std.ascii
> std.conv
> std.encoding
> std.range
> std.string
> std.format
> std.uni
> std.utf
>
> It's a mess. At least grouping the encoding stuff together would give it
> some structure.

I see people have no idea what Unicode is about.
Unicode is not only the encoding - it's a de facto standard of 
internationalization and related algorithms. UTF is encoding.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky