core.memory GC interface / specification

[safety0ff]

On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 17:15:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Most of these are sound like either implementation or 
> documentation bugs. Please file them in bugzilla 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/.

For interior pointer issues: 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
For non-GC pointer issue: 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11446

> Generally we can't force implementations to provide checks that 
> are possibly expensive to implement. So it might be more 
> appropriate to disallow using non-GC pointer with the GC, but 
> this needs some more thought.

Any preliminary thoughts on which approach should be taken for 
interior pointers with regards to these two functions?