Feature request: Bringing mixed-in operators and constructors to the overload set

[Timon Gehr]

On 11/19/2013 11:13 AM, Tommi wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 01:17:20 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Monday, 11 November 2013 at 21:58:44 UTC, Tommi wrote:
>>> Filed an enhancement request:
>>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11500
>>
>> Everything should work the same way.
>
> Do you mean that what I'm reporting is a compiler-bug rather than a
> feature request?

I'd argue yes, but similar issues have surprisingly attracted some 
controversy in the past. (The constructor aliasing is an enhancement 
though as it extends the language grammar.)