std.complex

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 26/11/13 17:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 11/26/13 3:22 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> So, as other people have suggested, really the only thing we can
>> reasonably do is to define a separate Imaginary type
>
> I agree. Let's move forward with this.

I've started work, code is here:
https://github.com/WebDrake/phobos/tree/imaginary

Feedback, forks/pull requests, etc. welcome.